收藏本站老师,前辈,朋友们给点建议圈养可 不可行?(种兔笼养,商品兔圈养)

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

账号登陆 【注册】 找回密码 开启辅助访问 切换到宽版
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 梅州养兔人
打印 上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[广东] 老师,前辈,朋友们给点建议圈养可 不可行?(种兔笼养,商品兔圈养)

  [复制链接]
16
发表于 2011-3-2 04:38:52 | 只看该作者
以前翻译过一篇国外有关笼养密度的实验报告,翻箱倒柜找出来,献给楼主,
不要谢,要谢就谢我们的党,不要问我叫什么,我的名字叫红领巾



=============================

Table 1: Effect of cage density on growth performance from weaning (30 d of age) to slaughter (2.2

kg body weight)

Initial density (rabbits/m2) 6 12 18 24

Initial density (cm2/rabbit) 1667 833 555 417

SEM1 L2 Pcov3

Length (d) 73.1 79.0 82.5 90.3 1.94 0.001 0.001

Daily gain (g/d/rabbit) 21.3 20.4 17.5 16.0 0.83 0.001 0.001

Feed intake (g/d/rabbit) 97.4 94.1 83.7 76.9 2.96 0.001 0.055

Feed efficiency (g/g) 0.219 0.218 0.210 0.208 0.0095 0.37 0.041

Mortality† (%) 9.42 10.2 9.27 20.5 4.10 0.14 0.002

Ringworm‡ (%) 37.3 44.0 36.6 68.9 12.8 0.20 0.083

Diarrhoea (%) 13.3 10.2 5.80 12.0 3.81 0.64 0.10

Injured‡ (%) 0.0 8.00 1.10 16.8 6.07 0.26 0.74

Final cage density

Live body weight§ (kg/m2) 11.3 24.2 34.3 41.1 1.54 0.001 0.008

No rabbits/m2 § 5.19 10.8 16.4 18.9 0.56 0.001 0.001

1n = 10 cages/treatment. 2Linear effect of density. 3Effect of average weaning weight per cage. §Quadratic effect of density

(P<0.050). †Significant effect of contrast 24 vs. (18, 12, 6) rabbits/m2 (P<0.050). ‡Tendency effect for contrast 24 vs. (18, 12,

6) rabbits/m2 (0.050<   【兔场建设】 titter<0.15)

1Departamento de Zootecnia, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela

2Departamento de Producción Animal, E.T.S.I. Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria,

28040 Madrid, Spain

ABSTRACT

Three hundred cross-breed rabbits of New Zealand, California, Butterfly, Dutch and Satin, weaned at

30 days and weighing 535±8 g (standard error) were assigned at random to four treatments: 6, 12, 18

and 24 rabbits/m2 (3, 6, 9 and 12 rabbits/cage, respectively, each cage of 0.5 m2) resulting 10

cages/treatment. During the experimental period (from weaning to 2.2 kg body weight) individual live

weight, cage feed intake, the incidence of diarrhoea, ringworm and injured rabbits were recorded. The

maximal temperature-humidity index ranged from 31 to 35 indicating a temporal severe heat stress. At

the end of the experimental period 10, 20, 30 and 30 rabbits from the treatments with densities of 6,

12, 18 and 24 rabbits/m2, respectively, were slaughtered and carcass performance recorded. Average

daily gain and feed intake from weaning to the end of experimental period decreased by 0.31±0.070

and 1.20±0.25 g, respectively, per each unit that the density increased at the beginning of the

experiment (P=0.001). The length of the fattening period increased by 0.91±0.16 d (P=0.001) per each

unit of increment of density. However, rabbit production (expressed in kg/m2) increased linearly and

quadratically with the density (P<0.008). Cage density did not affect feeding efficiency, that was on

average 0.214 g/g (P=0.37). Animals housed at the highest density compared to the average of those

caged at lower density tended to show a higher incidence of ringworm (68.9 vs. 39.4%; P=0.075), a

higher injured animals (16.8 vs. 3.03%; P=0.12) and a higher mortality (20.5 vs. 9.63; P=0.043).

Density did not modify dressing out percentage and chilled carcass weight. Increasing density reduced

linearly dorsal length (P=0.001) and reduced linearly and quadratically drip loss percentage (P=0.097

and 0.018, respectively). Based on these results, under our heat stress conditions it is recommended to

avoid densities higher than 18 rabbits/m2.


国外一篇养殖密度实验报告给我们的参考价值

作者:Villalobos O., Guillén O., García J. (2位委内瑞拉1位西班牙生物学家)

从断奶到出栏(断奶30天-4.4斤屠宰)在不同笼养密度条件下的生长发育结果

起始密度(只/平方米):             6       12      18      24

起始密度(平方厘米/只):        1667      833     555     417

养殖周期(天):                 73.1     79.0    82.5    90.3

日增重(g/天/只):              21.3     20.4    17.5    16.0

采食量(g/天/只):              97.4     94.1    83.7    76.9

饵料系数(g/ g):              0.219    0.218   0.210   0.208

死亡率(%):                    9.42     10.2    9.27    20.5

兔癣发病率(%):                37.3     44.0    36.6    68.9

腹泻发病率(%):                13.3     10.2    5.80    12.0

受伤率(%):                     0.0     8.00    11.0    16.8

最终养殖密度

单位禁用词语重量(kg/平方米):    11.3     24.2    34.3    41.1

单位存活数(只/平方米):        5.19     10.8    16.4    18.9

论文摘要

采用三百只不同品种的实验肉兔,包括新西兰、加利福尼亚、比利时、Satin品种,选择30天体重在535±8 g(误差范围)的断奶兔进行随机划分4组,养殖密度分别设定为6, 12, 18和24 只/m2,每个笼面积为0.5 m2(也就是3, 6, 9和12 只/笼),共分4个密度组,每一组10个笼位。

(估计该实验应该是单层高位床半散养模式)

实验期从断奶至养成到4.4斤出栏,分别对以下科目进行实验:单体增重、摄食量、饵料系数、腹泻发病率、兔癣发病率、受伤率、屠宰率。

实验全程的增重:摄食量=0.31±0.070g
: 1.20±0.25 g ,按单位面积产兔量计算,随着养殖密度的线性增加方差得出的结果差异性不显著
(P<0.008),说明养殖密度不影响饵料系数,平均值为:0.214 g/g ,(用国内养殖户的说法肉料比在1:4.67),

养殖密度与其它疾病的关系:兔癣发病率、死亡率、受伤率都伴随养殖密度的提高也呈现不断提高(P=0.075, P=0.12,P=0.043)

养殖密度不会改变屠宰出肉率和胴体冷冻重量。

结论:在兔子所能承受的高密应激下健康存活范围内,养殖密度最高不易超过18/m2






============================
英文太烂,有错误的地方多多谅解
17
发表于 2011-3-2 21:28:37 | 只看该作者
   【兔场建设】 victory
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 【注册】

本版积分规则

QQ|小黑屋|手机客户端|Archiver|东兔养兔论坛 ( 京ICP备14009985号-3 )  

GMT+8, 2024-11-14 01:58

Powered by Discuz! X3.2 Licensed

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表